When an author wants to prove a point, he/she can do one of
two things: be discrete, or include the reader in the process that proves that
point. Clearly, Ken Kesey has chosen the
former; what’s more he has taken the idea of ambiguity and exaggerated until
his point can come to be lost in the plot or in character profiles. McMurphy
was introduced to the novel when the narrator was the Chief Bromden that was
playing deaf and dumb, and, perhaps as a side note, he was actually insane. So in order to evaluate the evolution of McMurphy
as a character individually, one must take into account not only what happened,
but also what was going on with Bromden when he narrated it. It may well be that McMurphy didn’t change at
all, that the narration transformed into something more understanding and
rational because the narrator himself was slowly becoming more coherent. Let’s explore that possibility.
(Note for those who missed
it: in order to prove my point, I will use the option that Ken Kesey chose to
disregard)
At first the narrator is impressed with McMurphy’s
methodology. He is confused when
McMurphy brushes his teeth with soap instead of toothpaste. Bromden sees that as weird and funny, he
exposes McMurphy as trying to shift the power through the use of humor. The use of humor does stop. But McMurphy himself didn’t change and
neither did his goals. When McMurphy and
Chief Bromden decided to protect George in the showers and get in a fistfight
with the employees, the narrator himself is involved in disrupting order in the
ward. So what one might take as a change
in McMurphy— he has stopped using humor and turned towards violence— is really
all part of his plan, what has changed is that now Bromden understands the plan. Another
textual example could maybe be the most decisive moment in the plot, when
McMurphy attacks Ratched and rips her uniform open while trying to strangle
her. McMurphy has not become more
violent as the book progresses. He has
not changed his mind about trying to take away power from the Big Nurse. He has, however, affected Bromden
immensely. The newcomer that was
originally seen as eccentric and unnecessarily outspoken has changed in the eyes of Bromden to become someone
who will use violence if necessary in order to give justice to the ward and to
take down the totalitarian control. Through
these examples, I have attempted to bandwagon the readers into sharing my
interpretation of the novel— McMurphy didn’t change.
This is only a theory; the truth may be that McMurphy changed
completely as the novel progressed. The
only thing that is certain is that Kesey overplayed his hand. He tried to be discrete, and wound up being
open ended. With only a handful of interpretations being correct, pleasing the
author is close to impossible. That is
why the movie crashed and burned in Kesey’s opinion, and why my theory may be
entirely off the mark, yet, it is also what makes this book so intriguing.

No comments:
Post a Comment